"As we’ve said, Bard can sometimes give inaccurate or inappropriate information that doesn’t represent Google’s views and Bard should not respond in a way that endorses a particular viewpoint on subjective topics." "Since LLMs like Bard train on publicly available content, they can reflect positive or negative views of specific politicians, celebrities or other public figures, or even incorporate views on certain sides of controversial social or political issues into their responses," the spokesperson said. “I hope that the court will find in favor of the Justice Department and order Google to take steps to break up its monopoly.”Ī Google spokesperson told Fortune that Bard was still in its early stages and its purpose is to give users multiple viewpoints. These actions have harmed consumers and stifled innovation in the digital advertising market,” Bard responded. “Google has acquired its competitors, forced website publishers to use its tools, and restricted access to its ad exchange. This content is not available due to your privacy preferences. Department of Justice, and it promptly sided with the government. Hong Kong-based security researcher Jane Manchun Wong wrote on Twitter Tuesday that she asked Bard whose side it would pick in the antitrust lawsuit against Google filed by the U.S. It appears that the more widely-available Bard has already run into a hiccup. We will learn from it and keep iterating and improving,” Pichai wrote to employees. “We’ve taken a responsible approach to development, including inviting 10,000 trusted testers from a variety of backgrounds and perspectives, and we’ll continue to welcome all the feedback that’s about to come our way. who join the waitlist, with languages other than English to be added over time. But on Tuesday the company announced it was rolling out beta testing to thousands of users in the U.S. Until now, Google has kept interactions with Bard limited to hand-picked testers, including about 80,000 Google employees, according to Pichai. “As more people start to use Bard and test its capabilities, they’ll surprise us. journey,” Pichai wrote in the Tuesday memo to employees, according to CNBC. “Even after all this progress, we’re still in the early stages of a long A.l. Things will go wrong," he wrote in an email to staff on Tuesday, published by CNBC.Google is slowly releasing its chatbot Bard to the public, but the company’s CEO just warned employees that although thousands of people had already tested the A.I., it might still have a lot of problems. "As more people start to use Bard and test its capabilities, they'll surprise us. Google CEO Sundar Pichai has instructed employees to anticipate errors as people begin using Bard. In Bard's initial response to Crawford, the chatbot said it was also trained using "datasets of text and code from the web, such as Wikipedia, GitHub, and Stack Overflow," as well as data from companies that "partnered with Google to provide data for Bard's training." In a separate response that has since been deleted, Google also said, "No private data will be used during Barbs training process." It is not trained on Gmail data," the company said in a tweet. "Bard is an early experiment based on Large Language Models and will make mistakes. Gmail? I'm assuming that's flat out wrong, otherwise Google is crossing some serious legal boundaries," Crawford wrote.Ī few hours later, Google tried to set the record straight. "Anyone a little concerned that Bard is saying its training dataset includes. In her screenshot of the conversation, Bard responds that its dataset "comes from a variety of sources," one of which is "Google's internal data," including data from Gmail. Google Bard began rolling out to some users this week, and it's already hit a few snags.ĪI expert Kate Crawford posted an exchange she had with the new AI chatbot in which she asks where Bard's training dataset comes from.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |